![]() ![]() Like palemoon, it can make use of the ca-archive, in order to install addons which, among other features, will make it appear more 'firefox-like'. It actually requires less RAM to function as a browser than palemoon and throws in an HTML editor and email manager. Hopefully those who know how to compile web-browsers will acquire that taste. I just scanned thru this thread and see Mike 'made an appearance' in which he mentioned Seamonkey but suggested it 'was an acquired taste'. I have no reason to believe that Mike altered Irons' default setting when he relocated the portable to the chrooted environment. Ungoogle-chromium is based on chromium 89 and it had 2 or 3 settings not yet available under 88 and one setting where Iron was slightly more permissive which I could change to UG's stricter standard. ![]() I was pleasantly surprised to find that those 40 +/- settings were almost identical. I mentioned the chrooted version because -interested in how 'locked down' that system was- I compared its config setting to those used by Ungoolged Chromium. That, of course, is not the case with the portable. But my desktop is a reasonable powerful system and Mike suggests that on systems with less resources the chrooted environment -practically a whole other operating system- will take a toll. On my desktop that version remained very responsive and Pupsys-Info didn't indicate that a significant amount of RAM was being used. Mike also packages it as a browser working from a chrooted environment, viewtopic.php?p=4748#p4748. As far as I can tell, it functions as quickly as vivaldi. I've sometimes used "Speed Dial 2 New tab". Like vivaldi, it can make use of Chrome-extensions including speed-dials if you want one. May I suggest an alternative, Mike Walsh's portable iron. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |